Other People free essay sample

# 8217 ; s Money Essay, Research Paper At what cost does a company deserve to be taken off of life-support? While Gregory Peck would state that a surviving, durable company is deserving salvaging, Danny Divito sees it otherwise. # 8220 ; Who cares? # 8221 ; he asks. The company is really an investing, and no investing in demand of life-support is deserving salvaging. Not merely do Peck and Divito see the company otherwise, they besides relate to their audience on different degrees. In their addresss in Other People # 8217 ; s Money, Peck and Divito usage ethos, poignancy and Son with changing sums of success in their shareholder references. By analysing the manner that ethos, poignancy and Son effected the audience for first Peck, so Divito, it is possible to find for whom to vote and why. Get downing with fantastic calm backed by a familiar audience, Gregory Peck begins making creditability for his instance by adverting his experience and personal relationship with the electors. We will write a custom essay sample on Other People or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The audience is to believe what he has to state because of his history and because some of them have worked side by side with him. They are supposed know that through the experiences they have shared with him, he is competent and has good character. Peck besides reminds the audience that this is # 8220 ; the 39th ( run intoing ) of which I am turn toing you as your Chief Executive. # 8221 ; This one statement brings up history, Peck # 8217 ; s high place and his connexion to the audience. By stressing his similarity to the audience, every bit good as conveying up his place in the company, Peck does an first-class occupation of constructing his credibleness ( Adler and Elmhorst 428 ) . Peck # 8217 ; s effort at Son comes following and is provided through illustrations in the yesteryear where the company had its better yearss. He mentions that one time, the company was strong. Twice, Peck mentions that this is the company # 8217 ; s 73rd one-year meeting, an obvious effort to reassign some of the company # 8217 ; s positive consequences from the yesteryear to the present. Harmonizing to his logic since that was true so in the hereafter the company will go comfortable once more. This is by far the weakest portion of Peck # 8217 ; s statement. Possibly because he has no logical ground to maintain the company, he relies on ethos and poignancy to carry the audience. Peck relies to a great extent on poignancy to promote the audience to vote for him ( Adler and Elmhorst 429 ) . He speaks of yearss past when puting in the company made people experience good about themselves. He besides tells his audience that they should hold religions and believe that the company will go strong once more although he has no cogent evidence. Peck invariably speaks in the past tense and encourages the electors to utilize this past as good plenty cogent evidence that their dream for the hereafter is possible. This besides incorporates the thought that people should see the single people working in the company and feel sorry for them. Peck # 8217 ; s personal onslaughts against Divito could fall in any of the ethos, Son, pathos classs, but they seem to be extremely based in and targeted toward emotion. Peck has known the audience for a long clip. He plays upon that fact and the thought that they are all friends. By utilizing this technique he hopes to do the audience his friend and hold them band against Divito. He is seeking for brotherhood and utilizing and past dealingss in hopes of rocking the audience to his side. Peck uses a # 8220 ; Motivated Sequence # 8221 ; attack to first show that Divito is the job, and why the electors need to make something about him ( Adler and Elmhorst 433 ) . He so presents his solution to the job: clasp on to the stock. Peck following pigments a rose-colored image picturing the stock monetary value lifting if they follow his solution. He calls his audience to action by inquiring them to direct a message # 8220 ; to every Garfinkle in this land, # 8221 ; by voting against Divito. Divito, nevertheless, sees things diff erently. Danny Divito builds his creditability through competency and calm of his address. He seems non to concentrate on his character. Divito # 8217 ; s competency is shown chiefly through his past success in other concern trades and adept cognition of concern minutess. Peck himself mentioned how many companies Divito had dealt with. Helping his creditability, Divito # 8217 ; s calm is apparent throughout the smooth bringing of his address. Like Peck, Divito empathized his similarity to the audience ( Adler and Elmhorst 428 ) . Unlike the first talker, nevertheless, Divito uses money, non the company to supply the nexus. Divito efficaciously uses Son by conveying up current facts in response to Peck # 8217 ; s historical information. He speaks of how the stock monetary value is worth less now than when it was bought a few months ago. He besides uses the logical statement that the ground that investors invested money was to do money. However strong Peck # 8217 ; s appeal toward poignancy, this logical pecuniary statement certainly made people in the audience listen. Divito provides an illustration of another company that was really good at what it did, but was besides disused. Divito utilizes an statement based more on logos than on poignancy. Divito uses poignancy to some extent. He tries to do the audience angry with the town and the company for stealing their money. By bodying the company as a stealer he hopes to do the audience want to penalize the stealer by voting to breakup the company. This besides is an first-class method of doing the audience think of the company itself, instead than the single workers as Peck would wish them to concentrate on ( Adler and Elmhorst 425 ) . Knowing that his audience consists of investors in the company, Divito besides knows that investors by and large give money in hopes of doing money. By utilizing this thought of greed and the privation for more money he uses the facts to rock the audience to go cold and distant from the company. He knows that the audience hates him. He besides realizes that there is no manner to go their friend. Therefore, he does non seek to make so. Furthermore, showing his honestness, Divito openly admits he does non desire to be their friend. But he does play on their common sense and their privation of money to acquire his point across. Divito efficaciously deals with a tough audience by concentrating on money alternatively of himself. Furthermore, he delays conveying up his chief point until he has provided some information to endorse it up. This avoids losing the audience by stating # 8220 ; You should sell your stock, and here # 8217 ; s why, # 8221 ; ( Adler and Elmhorst 424 ) . After analyzing the methods by which Peck and Divito relate to their audience utilizing ethos, Son and poignancy, it is apparent to group 7 that Divito is the right individual for whom to vote. While most people might non be proud of this determination, traveling against the way in which their emotions draw them, true investors will hold no problem utilizing logical entreaties to endorse up their pick. Viewing audiences of the film are most likely detached wholly organize the company, and hence are effected more strongly by the logos-based statement provided by Danny Divito. In shutting, this treatment of the ethos, Son and poignancy statements made by Gregory Peck and Danny Divito show that Peck # 8217 ; s gripping emotion based supplications were outweighed by Divito # 8217 ; s logical and tactful bringing of his solution. In Other People # 8217 ; s Money, two different speech production manners are placed caput to caput, and in the terminal it is clear which 1 was more effectual. Bibliography Adler, R.B. and J.M. Elmhorst. Communicating at Work.Boston: McGraw-Hill College, 1999. Other People # 8217 ; s Money Dir. Norman Jewison. Perf. Danny DeVito, Gregory Peck, Penelope Ann Miller Piper Laurie, Dean Jones. Warner Brothers. 1991